In the Article “Keep on Fracking? Criticism grows, but
Impact Not Clear” it is stated that the EPA has estimated that by 2035
non-conventional gas will supply 45 percent of the nation’s natural gas
consumption. Once again, this article
provides information of the environmental side effects that come along with
fracking; of course water contamination. States such as New Jersey have already
placed a ban on fracking, and Pennsylvania is producing its own regulations,
while other states have decided that jobs are more important than the
environment. That brings up a new question in my mind. Are jobs or the
environment more important? In my personal opinion the environment is much more
important, because the environment is not something that can be reproduced or
found elsewhere, it is what we live in. President Obama has worked to make some
recommendations concerning fracking but as expected environmentalists feels
that these recommendations are too soft and the oil executives feel that these
suggestions are too harsh. Obama has made clear he wanted the shale gas
industry to grow, but doesn’t want any harm to the environment. This obviously
isn’t possible concerning fracking is contaminating water in more than one
location. Since President Obama’s appointee to work on something must be done
to make a definitive decision concerning fracking instead of a compromise.
http://www.sciencedirect.com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/science/article/pii/S1040619011002302